What if the product makes nothing?^
Then we make nothing. There is no floor under our side, no minimum, no invoice that appears at the end of the year. That is not generosity. It is the structure, and it is the reason we will argue with you about the idea before we spend our own money building it.
Is a revenue share more expensive than a fee in the long run?^
If the product works, yes, eventually. We are not going to pretend otherwise. What the share buys you is that nobody who was paid up front has any reason to still be there in month four, and we have no way of eating unless we are.
Do I have to learn to code, or manage engineers?^
No. You stay the voice, the taste, and the distribution. You never hire anyone, you never brief a developer, and you never open the support inbox. If this deal turns you into a manager, we have failed at the only thing it exists to do.
How much of my time does it actually take?^
Real, but small, and concentrated where only you can help: the read of your audience at the start, a working session each week during the build, and your voice on the launch. We will tell you the honest number in the terms rather than the flattering one.
Will my audience bring the bugs to me, in my comments?^
Some will, and we cannot stop that. What we can do is make sure the product has its own name, its own support address, and its own people answering, so the default path is not your face. When something breaks, we write the apology and we ship the fix.
Who holds the customer relationship?^
Those subscribers come from your audience, and nothing changes that. The legal accountability for their data and their money sits with whoever is the seller of record, which is a decision the written terms make explicitly rather than leave to be discovered later. Whichever way it lands, you see every number that matters: subscriber counts, cohorts, revenue, churn, and every line of the calculation that produces your payment.
Is this equity? Am I giving away part of my business?^
No. The share is on what the product earns, not on your company, not on your audience, and not on anything you already sell. Your brand deals and your existing income stay entirely yours.
Isn't this just a technical co-founder?^
It is the closest thing on that table, and we take that as a compliment. Two things decide it. What we take a piece of: a co-founder takes a permanent share of your whole company and everything you build after this, while we take a share of one product's revenue and nothing else you do is touched. And how you leave: there is no clean way to remove a co-founder, but there is a published price to buy us out from month twelve. A co-founder makes you a startup founder with a partner in everything. We keep you a creator with one product running behind you. And a good technical co-founder who is available, wants your idea rather than their own, and is still there in year three is close to impossible to find. We already exist, and we have already built.
I already sell a course. What if the product competes with it?^
Then we say so before we build it, and we write the rule into the terms. A product that quietly eats your existing income and pays us a share of it is a bad deal for you, and we are not interested in one of those.
You have a studio taking retainers. Whose Tuesday do I get in month five?^
A fair question, and the honest answer is that the partnership is the higher offer for a reason: it is where our own upside lives. We take one or two a year precisely so that the answer to this question stays true.
You have not done this with another creator yet. Why would I go first?^
Because first is the best seat. The terms get written around your business rather than inherited from someone else's, you take the exclusivity in your niche with nothing already sold around you, and you get a team whose whole reputation in this line of work will rest on your product being the one that worked. The work itself is not new to us: we have built a product, put it in front of paying users, and been running and shipping it every week since. What is new is the deal, not the building and not the running.
What exactly do you lock yourself out of by taking me on?^
The same promise to the same audience. Not your whole category. The test we write into the agreement is simple: if a paying subscriber of your product could reasonably subscribe to theirs instead, that person is a competitor and we will not build for them while we are building for you. Outside that line we keep running the platform, and that is precisely what keeps us cheap enough to be worth having. We are not going to lock ourselves out of entire industries on a handshake, and you would not want a partner who did, because that partner would have to charge you for it.
Does audience size matter?^
Far less than you think, and far less than how specific you are. A small audience that turns up for one precise thing beats a large one that turns up for a mood. Specific gives us a product that is obvious, a market we can name, and an exclusivity we can actually honour. Vague gives us a guess.
Why only one or two a year?^
Because we are paid from what these products earn, and running one properly is a multi-year commitment. A partnership we cannot run is worth nothing to us. That constraint is the whole quality control.
If I write the brief and you say no, what stops you building my idea with someone else?^
We do not take a rejected brief to another partner. Ask for that in writing before you send anything, and we will send it.
Can I just hire you to build it and pay you normally?^
Yes, but not here. That is the studio, and it is priced as a retainer. This page is for the deal where nobody gets paid unless the thing works.